|
|
|
Peter Knight, Joseph Pelton,Francis Method, and Takeshi Utsumi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives |
|
Measures Needed to Achieve Objectives |
|
Background and Rationale |
|
Finance and Organization |
|
Next Steps – Recommendations of the CITI Working
Group – February 2000 |
|
A New Proposal developed at June 2000
international conference on “Saving Iridium” |
|
|
|
|
|
Expand educational opportunities and improve
health in developing countries by enabling these countries to |
|
Make full use of electronic distance education
and telemedicine |
|
Participate actively and fully in data-intensive
and media-intensive exchanges with both developed countries and other
developing countries |
|
Participate interactively and fully in joint
research, professional development, and knowledge-building activities with
institutions and organizations in other countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make available sufficient broad bandwidth at
free or highly reduced cost to enable a significant number of developing
countries to undertake major new initiatives in distance learning and
telemedicine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce the cost of broadband connectivity to a
level poor countries can afford. |
|
Create policy and regulatory frameworks
conducive to the development of sustainable distance education and
telemedicine programs. |
|
Establish high-quality applications in
sufficient developing country sites to demonstrate technical feasibility,
increase demand, and build support for more extensive use of such
technologies in developing country contexts. |
|
|
|
|
The Internet, with its rapidly expanding and
improving infrastructure, will be the main telecommunication media of
tomorrow. |
|
The full potential for achieving revolutionary
advances in education and healthcare in developing countries cannot be
realized with the currently available information delivery infrastructure
and at currently prevailing market prices. |
|
|
|
|
Improved distance education requires much better
ways of presenting information and of enabling learners to interact with
facilitators to enable the learners to process that information into
personal knowledge. |
|
What is needed is both high quality audio/video
delivery and high quality interactivity. |
|
Developing countries need broadband Internet via
international satellite and fiber-optic cable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A voluntary international e-rate for education
and health |
|
Two separate contribution “funds” or “sources”
would be established |
|
an
in-kind bandwidth transmission source |
|
a financial assistance source |
|
The Coalition: a broad coalition of commercial
and governmental sources |
|
|
|
|
Money from the “money fund” will be used to
purchase more bandwidth from the companies that donate free bandwidth. |
|
|
|
|
Overseas Development Assistance funds of OECD
countries |
|
Cash contributions from the profits of
international financial institutions such as the World Bank and the RDBs |
|
Cash contributions from foundations and
companies |
|
Contributions in kind from companies owning
underused satellite transponders and/or fiber optic cable (marginal cost
near zero, builds future markets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSTF allocations only to countries with “good”
telecommunications, education, and health policies |
|
A participatory process to define “good”, with
ITU, UNESCO, and WHO convening working groups including all key
stakeholders |
|
World Bank to convene working group on GSTF
operations – possible use of infoDev legal precedent for multidonor
grantmaking organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund’s bandwidth source might be allocated
through a variety of means that might even include an auction process to
organizers of distance education and telemedicine projects in qualifying
countries. |
|
The cash source might be used for grants to fund
access to bandwidth for such projects, with rules favoring poorer countries
and end beneficiaries, assuring a certain geographical distribution of
benefits between regions, and so forth. |
|
|
|
|
A more polished and developed draft of the
proposal be put before major international conferences in 2000 |
|
An intensive effort be made to enlist the
support of the leadership of the key international institutions |
|
Working groups on telecommunications policy
conditionality, education policy conditionality, healthcare policy
conditionality, and operational aspects of the Fund and the Coalition be
convened respectively by ITU, UNESCO, WHO, and the World Bank. |
|
|
|
|
Objectives, photographs from the conference and
full proposal |
|
|
|
knight-moore.com/projects/projectsindex.htm |
|
|
|
|
CITI prepares a proposal to get seed money to
convene workshops, prepare background materials |
|
Workshops would be held under the auspices of
international organizations to establish policy conditions for GSTF funding |
|
But if international organizations don’t move,
CITI could convene, inviting all key stakeholders to participate |
|
Summit Conference early in 2001, convoked by
CITI and/or other organizations |
|
|
|